Independent · Evidence-based
AI in dentistry, decoded.
New studies keep claiming an algorithm can spot caries, plan an implant or read an X-ray as well as a specialist. Decadentry reads the paper, checks the numbers and explains what actually held up — for clinicians, students and curious patients.
- One peer-reviewed study per article
- Numbers checked against the paper
- DOI and author credit on every post
Latest research
Fresh from the journals, explained.
AI Gum Disease Prediction: Forecast or Shaky Guess?
AI gum disease prediction tools have multiplied for 46 years, yet a 2026 review rated all but one of 20 models high risk of bias. What…
Autonomous Dental Implant Robot: Precision or Peril?
An autonomous dental implant robot placed zygomatic implants within 0.87 mm — but in resin models, and 1 in 5 sites cracked. Precision or peril?
AI Implant Planning: A Surgeon’s Blueprint or a Rough Draft?
AI implant planning from CBCT matched specialists within ~1.7 mm — but picked implant size right only 65–75% of the time. Promise and peril, checked.
AI Orthodontic Simulation: Real Preview or a Guess?
AI orthodontic simulation renders a photorealistic 'after' face most people can't spot — but it draws the plan, it can't predict your real result.
AI for Dental Anxiety in Kids: Calm or a Slower Pulse?
AI for dental anxiety in children: a 2026 RCT found an AI self-modelling app cut heart rate more than a standard video, but not the main…
AI MB2 Canal Detection: Real Fix or Just a Prototype?
AI MB2 canal detection hits near-expert accuracy on CBCT scans, but a 2026 review found all 5 models stuck at prototype stage. Here's what that means.
Explore by topic
Find the research that matters to your work.
Each topic collects our explainers in one place, newest first — a quick way to see where the evidence is strong and where it is still thin.
Our method
How a study becomes a Decadentry article.
Hype is cheap. Checking a methods section is not. Every explainer goes through the same four steps before it is published.
Find
We track new peer-reviewed papers on AI in dentistry through PubMed and the major dental journals — not press releases.
Verify
Every statistic is checked against the study’s methods and results. If a headline claim can’t be verified, it isn’t published.
Translate
We explain what was tested, on whom and how well — in plain language, with a custom figure for the key result.
Weigh
Each article sets the promise against the limits: validation, bias, cost, accountability and who gets access.
Who writes Decadentry
Written by a dentist who reads the methods section.
Decadentry is led by Hossein Boustani Hezarani, a dentist trained at Azerbaijan Medical University who researches how artificial intelligence is changing healthcare. He started Decadentry to close the gap between what AI papers report and what clinicians and patients actually need to know.
- Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS), Azerbaijan Medical University
- Co-author of PubMed-indexed reviews on artificial intelligence in medicine
- Contributing author to six books on AI in healthcare (2023–2026)
- Builder of open-source dental tools — DentRx, OraCalm and OdontoAge
What is Decadentry?
Decadentry is an independent publication that explains new peer-reviewed research on artificial intelligence in dentistry in plain language. Each article focuses on one study: what it tested, what it found, how strong the evidence is and what it means for patients and clinicians.
Who is it for?
Dentists, dental students, researchers and patients who want to understand AI in dentistry without the hype. Articles open with a 30-second summary, show the key numbers and end with separate takeaways for patients and clinicians.
How do you choose and check the studies?
We focus on recent peer-reviewed papers on AI in dental diagnostics, imaging, treatment planning, devices and education. Statistics are checked against the paper itself, and every article ends with the study’s DOI and author credit. Preprints are clearly labelled as not yet peer-reviewed.
Can AI replace my dentist?
Not on current evidence. Most dental AI tools are tested as assistants — flagging possible decay, bone loss or anatomy on images — and many have not yet been validated outside the clinic where they were developed. The research we cover consistently points to AI supporting clinical judgement, not replacing it.
Is Decadentry medical advice?
No. Our articles explain published research for educational purposes. They are not a substitute for a diagnosis or treatment plan from a qualified dental professional. See our medical disclaimer.
How often do you publish?
New explainers are published several times a week. Join the Decadentry Brief below to receive each one by email.






